Scandal – ILLEGALS Get Huge Win!

In a baffling move that can only be described as a leap off the cliff of common sense, Santa Ana’s City Council has voted to place a measure on the November 2024 ballot that, if passed, would allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections. Yes, you heard that right. Undocumented residents, permanent residents, green card holders, asylum seekers, and refugees could soon have a say in how thing are run. This head-scratching measure is the brainchild of council members Jonathan Hernandez and Benjamin Vazquez, who seem to be on a mission to turn the city’s governance into a free-for-all.


The council’s decision was far from unanimous, narrowly passing with a 4-3 vote. The usual suspects, council members Jessie Lopez, Thai Viet Phan, Ben Vazquez, and Jonathan Ryan Hernandez, unsurprisingly voted in favor. Meanwhile, voices of reason like Mayor Valerie Amezcua and council members Phil Bacerra and David Penaloza voiced their serious concerns. They warned that this harebrained scheme would likely lead to costly legal battles and necessitate the creation of a new, convoluted system for voter registration and ballot counting.

Proponents of this measure argue that noncitizens contribute significantly to Santa Ana’s economy and community, and therefore deserve a voice in local governance. Councilmember Thai Viet Phan, apparently reaching for a history book in a dark room, compared the expansion of voting rights to the struggle for women’s suffrage before the 19th Amendment. The supporters believe this measure will empower residents affected by local policies who currently have no say in their creation.

However, critics rightfully point out that this measure is hasty, ill-conceived, and lacking in thorough planning. They fear it could prompt legal challenges similar to those seen in San Francisco, where noncitizen voting in school board elections was recently struck down by an appellate court. Mayor Amezcua and other sensible voices argue that the measure could lead to voter fraud and complicate election processes.

This debate in Santa Ana mirrors larger national conversations about voting rights and immigration. Nearby cities like Huntington Beach are taking a starkly different approach, proposing stricter voter ID laws to ensure only citizens vote. This contrast highlights the divergent perspectives on how to balance inclusivity with election integrity.


If Santa Ana voters approve this measure, it would make the city the first in Southern California to allow noncitizens to vote in local elections, setting a dangerous precedent that could influence other cities across the state and country. As the 2024 election approaches, this initiative is poised to be a significant issue, reflecting broader tensions and debates within American society about immigration and democratic participation.

Santa Ana’s decision to include this measure on the ballot reflects its unique demographic composition, with a large noncitizen population contributing to its local economy. This move underscores the city’s progressive stance on immigration and civic engagement, even as it braces for potential legal challenges and logistical hurdles.

The outcome of this vote could have far-reaching implications for noncitizen voting rights and the broader discussion on electoral reform in the United States. As the campaign unfolds, both supporters and opponents will likely intensify their efforts to sway public opinion and ensure a robust turnout for this pivotal decision in November 2024. Stay tuned, folks—this is going to be a wild ride.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR