
Reforming California’s Ballot-Counting System for Efficiency and Integrity
California’s sluggish ballot-counting process isn’t just a minor inconvenience—it’s a looming crisis that threatens national politics. Delays are leaving millions of votes uncounted, creating uncertainty and breeding skepticism. Introducing a more efficient system is imperative for restoring election integrity and voter confidence.
Current System Inefficiencies
Nine of the 16 races that determine House control are in California, stressing the state’s significant role in national governance. Yet, the ballot-counting process is notorious for its delays, causing nearly 5 million ballots to remain uncounted a week after Election Day. Critics and political representatives alike are questioning the reliability of a system where lawmakers are sworn in before results are certified.
Supporters argue that the slow, deliberate process ensures accuracy and maximizes voter participation. However, with 570,000 ballots still uncounted two weeks after elections, the defense seems weak. The situation gives rise to claims of disinformation from both parties, fueling further mistrust in the system.
Root Causes of Delay
The Voter’s Choice Act of 2016 massively overhauled California’s voting system, implementing voter centers and universal mail-in voting. While intended to increase participation, these measures have been critiqued for prolonging the counting process. Mail-in ballots, taking up to seven days postmarked by Election Day, add to the delays.
“California elections can be described in one word: Slow,” Austin Gilbert, a Republican campaign field operative told a House committee.
Signature comparisons for mail-in ballots vary by county, contributing to inefficiencies. The state imposed a temporary law mandating certification only 28 days post-election, exacerbating the delays associated with a drawn-out counting process.
Proposed Reforms for a Seamless System
To address these delays, California legislators are considering bills focusing on mail ballots and voter registration procedures. Implementing a unified digital system could mitigate discrepancies and hasten the tabulation process. A streamlined approach is not only crucial for quick election results but also imperative for maintaining democratic integrity.
“This is uniquely important because the balance of power in the United States House of Representatives at that time still had not been determined, in large part because the races in California weren’t called due to the lax election laws that are resulting in these delays,” said Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wis.
Without reform, California’s ballot-counting inefficiencies will continue to undermine voter faith and disrupt national politics. Establishing a reliable system is critical to prevent further chaos and secure a future where every vote is counted swiftly and accurately.