Chris Wallace Admits That Changing Mail In Voting Procedures Could Lead To More Fraud (REPORT)

, , 25 Comments

After spending months claiming that mail in fraud was safe, it looks like Chris Wallace is finally starting to change his tune.

According to Mediaite, Democrat Fox News host Chris Wallace stunned fans when he suggested that Donald Trump may have a point when criticizing mail in voting. Wallace agreed that Donald Trump’s claims are not without merit.

Wallace Says Mail In Voting Might Be Dangerous After All

While hosting his Fox News show, Chris Wallace finally admitted that mail in voting could be too overwhelming for the United States Postal Service (USPS). He admits that Trump may be right to be worried.

Wallace told his guest that increased mail in voting could lead to possible fraud:

“Hear me out for a minute. Isn’t it possible that the president really has a point here? As I mentioned earlier, there were 33 million either absentee or mail-in ballots in 2016. If we have double that or triple that, isn’t there a pretty good chance that we will have a mess, at the least. And yes, possibly fraud?”

Wallace’s comments come just weeks after President Trump announced that he would DENY making any new changes to the United States Postal Service before the 2020 presidential election. He believes that the changes could make the voting system very vulnerable to fraud because there won’t be enough time to make the election secure in just 3 months.

Do YOU think that Democrats are trying to rig the 2020 election? Comment below!

Like our news coverage? Then subscribe to our daily email newsletter below:


 

25 Responses

  1. Richard Paul

    August 17, 2020 10:27 pm

    Can’t hold it back any longer. Kamala Harris is bad for America and needs to be removed from all Political positions.
    She has more bad baggage that meets the eye.
    America to include Biden can do better. Its unfortunate but its for the good of America.

    Reply
  2. Michael Webster

    August 18, 2020 12:16 am

    Hey Caty did you know we are in a pandemic that is highly contagious, so many people don’t want to risk getting the virus which has killed over160 thousand people. Are you going to vote in person, by the way the President and everyone in his administration will be doing mail-in voting and they have been doing it for years. What hypocrisy they are not going to risk their lives by voting in person, but they tell you to. Trump even admitted on FOX and Friends that he is with holding funding to the post office so it will not be able handle voting by mail. This shows you how just of touch republicans are by doing things they say they need to do to fix the post office during a pandemic by cutting wages and benefits and taking away their right to collective bargain by trying to get rid of the postal union. Yes reforms need to be made but do it after the pandemic has ended, you don’t take money away from people, how out of touch!

    Reply
  3. SUSAN D

    August 18, 2020 3:20 am

    Pandemic.??!!!!
    This IS / WAS an INTENTIONAL CREATION of China… Thanks to people like FAUCI & democRATS….to give AMERICAN TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE to China..!!! – who SPREAD the VIRUS on Each CONTINENT…to STOP The RE-ELECTION of PRES TRUMP….because CHINA would NOT Be ABLE to STEAL Everything from The USA !!!

    Reply
  4. Eric

    August 18, 2020 8:17 am

    HEY MICHAEL WEBSTER, YOUR DARKENED EVIL SOULS PARTY IS THE ONE THAT HAS BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS FROM ALL THE DEATHS DUE TO YOUR EVIL PLANNEDEMIC!!!!

    Reply
  5. Stell

    August 18, 2020 8:35 am

    If we have to put up with her for 4 years??? We put up with “O” for 8 years and he came to the riversedge of killing America and now some one who does not know how to negotiate with any one expect making up stories to fit
    the party to a trial judge????? What has happened to honesty and common sense.

    Reply
  6. Bill Liebiedz

    August 18, 2020 9:02 am

    People who wish not to go in person to vote can request an absentee ballot which will be sent by their district and would be returned to the district for verification anad tabulation. The “everybody gets a mail-in ballot” system has no accountability for the authenticity of the voter who returns such a ballot. This would mean that people who are not registered to vote in a certain district due to moving out of district, death, or non-US citizenship status could be counted. Unless the voting rolls are kept up to date, we would never know who voted and who voted multiple times. Some people might be on more than 1 voting roll due to change of address. Some might use multiple addresses to vote more than once, say your prime residence and a house at a lake or beach. It just makes things more difficult to verify authenticity of the vote. Get an absentee ballot if you do not want to go in person.

    Reply
  7. Marlopi

    August 18, 2020 10:43 am

    Finally Wallace says something resembling the truth. President Trump is correct all the way. The postal service should not be used as a tool by Socialist Democrats to corrupt another election. We need to fight to return to a FAIR election where American CITIZENS ONLY cast a vote. I cannot see why people have trouble acknowledging the word ILLEGAL means a non-American who is NOT eligible for any rights under the constitution.

    Reply
  8. george cull

    August 18, 2020 10:49 am

    definately the DEMORATS ARE TRYING TO SCREW UP THE ENTIRE ELECTION SO THEY CAN STEAL THE ELECTION AND bLAME TRUMP AND USPS

    Reply
  9. blog

    December 28, 2020 8:55 pm

    golikov1r@mail.ru

    Right here is the perfect web site for everyone who wants to find out about this topic.
    You know so much its almost tough to argue with you (not
    that I personally would want to…HaHa). You certainly put a brand new spin on a subject that’s been discussed for many years.
    Wonderful stuff, just wonderful!

    Reply
  10. Levi Lenn

    January 1, 2021 4:01 pm

    An attention-grabbing dialogue is value comment. I’m sure that its better to write on this topic, towards the often be a taboo topic but typically persons are not sufficient to speak on such topics. To another location. Cheers

    Reply

Leave a Reply